The Startup

Get smarter at building your thing. Follow to join The Startup’s +8 million monthly readers & +772K…

Follow publication

Member-only story

The Floor and Ceiling Approaches to Income Redistribution

Amanda Silver
The Startup
Published in
8 min readNov 27, 2020

--

For months, governments around the world have been sorting through the economic devastation caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic, putting in measures in an attempt to spur a U-shaped recovery, and avoid what seems to be an inevitable K-shaped one. But there’s another, more sinister U that has been growing for decades, one that is not a sign of a healthy economy.

In the early 2000s, economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez used a century’s worth of data to visualize income and wealth inequality over time. Their findings validated a sense of injustice what many had been experiencing: by 2013 the top 0.1% were collecting over 10% of the nation’s income. The top 10% earned 50% of the nation’s income. After a period of compression and growth of the middle class that began in the 1940s—due in part to the New Deal, financial regulation, progressive taxation, and World War II—modern American society had reverted to the way it had looked in the age of robber barons and monopoly tycoons. Inequality over time was U shaped.

Graph sourced from Saez, 2016. A similar trend is observed in post-tax income share and wealth share.

What We Should Do About Inequality

--

--

The Startup
The Startup

Published in The Startup

Get smarter at building your thing. Follow to join The Startup’s +8 million monthly readers & +772K followers.

Amanda Silver
Amanda Silver

Written by Amanda Silver

Workplace researcher, operator, and storyteller; passionate about using operations to improve jobs.

Responses (6)